Preview

Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy

Advanced search

Treatment Strategy in Patients with Gastric Outlet Stenosis at the Multidisciplinary Center

https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2026-71-3-4-43-47

EDN: ENMBBJ

Abstract

Background. Gastric outlet stenosis is one of the most frequent and severe complications of gastric cancer; it significantly limits the possibility of antitumor therapy and worsens the prognosis of the disease. Gastric outlet stenosis develops in 15–30% of patients with distal forms of gastric cancer. According to current research, the median overall survival in palliative care for patients with gastric obstruction ranges from 3 to 6 months after stenting and from 6 to 12 months after surgical bypass anastomosis.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of treatment of patients with gastric outlet stenosis, taking into account: the timing of the start of chemotherapy, the timing of recovery of enteral nutrition, the duration of hospitalization, the frequency of complications, the frequency of repeated interventions, and overall patient survival.

Materials and methods. A retrospective, single-sample study was conducted. The study included 183 patients. Unlike a number of studies, the evaluation of treatment effectiveness included not only the timing of the start of chemotherapy, but also the timing of recovery of enteral nutrition, the duration of hospitalization, the frequency of complications, the need for repeated interventions, and overall survival rates.

Results. The majority of patients (58.47%) were admitted with stage IV cancer. After endoscopic stenting, the resumption of oral food intake occurred most quickly — on average within 1–3 days, while most patients could take liquid and soft food in the first days after the intervention. The earliest time to start chemotherapy was observed in patients after performing radical surgery — 25.2 days. The shortest period of hospitalization was also observed in patients who underwent stenting and amounted to 5–7 days.

Conclusion. The results obtained demonstrate that despite the use of modern treatment methods, there is still a high proportion of late-stage cases of the disease and the need for further optimization of treatment tactics.

About the Authors

A. V. Klimashevich
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Alexsandr V. Klimashevich — D. Sc. in Medicine, surgeon, Oncologist, Senior Researcher

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



A. A. Karpov
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Alexei A. Karpov — D. Sc. in Medicine, surgeon, Oncologist, Senior Researcher, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



N. Yu. Sokolov
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Nikolay Yu. Sokolov — Ph. D. in Medicine, Oncologist, Senior Researcher, Head of the Department of Oncology and Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 15

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



Y. E. Feoktistov
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Yaroslav E. Feoktistov — Ph. D. in Medicine, Surgeon, Oncologist, scientific applicant doctoral candidate

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



V. M. Kulushev
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Vadim M. Kulushev — Ph.D. in Medicine, Oncologist, Coloproctologist, Senior Researcher, Head of the Oncological and Proctological Department No. 74

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



M. Yu. Yudin
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Maksim Yu. Yudin — Ph. D. in Medicine, Surgeon, Oncologist, Research Associate

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



D. S. Bochanikov
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Dmitri S. Bochanikov — Ph. D. in Medicine, Surgeon, Research Associate, Head of the Emergency Surgery Department No. 75

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



A.  A. Kolotilshchikov
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Andrei A. Kolotilshchikov — Ph. D. in Medicine, Surgeon, Research Associate, Head of the Emergency Surgery Department No. 76

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



K. I. Kurbaytaev
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Kurbanmagomed I. Kurbaytaev — Surgeon of the Emergency Surgery Department No. 75

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



R. U. Saltamuradov
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center
Russian Federation

Razanbek U. Saltamuradov — Resident Doctor

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



M. A. Klimashevich
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Mihail A. Klimashevich — student

Moscow


Competing Interests:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов



References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71 (3): 209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.

2. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2023 godu (zabolevaemost' i smertnost'). AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky. AO Shakhzadova. (eds). Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU «NMITs radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii. 2024; 276. (In Russ.)

3. Upchurch E, Ragusa M, Cirocchi R. Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5 (5): CD012506. Published 2018 May 30. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012506.pub2.

4. Jeurnink SM, van Eijck CH, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2007; 7: 18. Published 2007 Jun 8. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-7-18.

5. Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020; 396 (10251): 635–648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5.

6. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Corvera CU, Das P, Enzinger PC et al. Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2025, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2025; 23 (5): 169–191. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0022.

7. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2023; 26 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8

8. van Hooft JE, van Halsema EE, Vanbiervliet G, Beets-Tan RGH, DeWitt J, Donnellan F et al. Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014; 46 (11): 990–1053. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390700.

9. Ye BW, Lee KC, Hou MC. Endoscopic management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. J Chin Med Assoc. 2021; 84 (4): 346–353. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000502.


Review

For citations:


Klimashevich AV, Karpov AA, Sokolov NY, Feoktistov YE, Kulushev VM, Yudin MY, Bochanikov DS, Kolotilshchikov AA, Kurbaytaev KI, Saltamuradov RU, Klimashevich MA. Treatment Strategy in Patients with Gastric Outlet Stenosis at the Multidisciplinary Center. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2026;71(3-4):43-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2026-71-3-4-43-47. EDN: ENMBBJ

Views: 332

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-2990 (Print)