Verification of Penicillin Allergy in Obstetric Practice as a Tool for Rational Antibiotic Therapy
https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2026-71-3-4-70-83
EDN: TKVLEU
Abstract
Penicillin allergy is one of the most frequently reported drug reactions among pregnant women; however, in most cases, the diagnosis is based solely on patient history without objective verification. In obstetric practice, this has substantial clinical implications, as β-lactam antibiotics remain first-line agents for the prevention and treatment of infections, including intrapartum prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus, antibiotic prophylaxis during cesarean delivery, and treatment of syphilis in pregnancy. An unverified allergy label limits the use of optimal treatment regimens, promotes the prescription of broader-spectrum alternatives, and may be associated with an increased risk of infectious complications. This review analyzes current evidence on the evaluation of penicillin allergy in pregnant patients, including skin testing, direct oral challenges, and risk stratification tools. Clinical studies demonstrate a high rate of penicillin allergy de-labeling and a favorable safety profile of diagnostic procedures when appropriate patient selection is applied. The article also discusses the impact of allergy verification on antibiotic prescribing patterns and obstetric outcomes. Verification of penicillin allergy within routine prenatal care should be considered an essential component of rational antibiotic therapy and antimicrobial stewardship in obstetrics. Expanding targeted diagnostic strategies may increase the use of first-line β-lactam antibiotics without adversely affecting maternal or neonatal outcomes.
About the Authors
D. A. EnikeevRussian Federation
Damir A. Enikeev — D. Sc. in Medicine, Professor
Ufa
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
M. G. Bazaliy
Russian Federation
Maria G. Bazaliy — Therapist
Arkhangelsk
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
A. D. Pilyasova
Russian Federation
Anna D. Pilyasova — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
A. I. Ignatenko
Russian Federation
Alexandr I. Ignatenko — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
M. A. Tokova
Russian Federation
Mekka A. Tokova — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
A. K. Pacheva
Russian Federation
Alina K. Pacheva — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
S. K. Nersisyan
Russian Federation
Suzanna K. Nersisyan — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
E. A. Aleksandrov
Russian Federation
Egor A. Alexandrov — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
I. R. Anisimova
Russian Federation
Irina R. Anisimova — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
T. S. Alibekova
Russian Federation
Tamila S. Alibekova — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
A. A. Zaikin
Russian Federation
Artem A. Zaikin — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
E. A. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Evgeniya A. Kuznetsova — Student
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
V. A. Burnysheva
Russian Federation
Veronika A. Burnysheva — Independent researcher
Competing Interests:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи
References
1. Pereverzev AP, Zyryanov SK, Guschina YSh. Modern methods of identification of adverse events associated with medication errors. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. 2016; (4): 11–16. (In Russ.)
2. Zhou L, Dhopeshwarkar N, Blumenthal KG, Goss F, Topaz M, Slight SP, Bates DW. Drug allergies documented in electronic health records of a large healthcare system. Allergy. 2016; 71 (9): 1305–13. doi: 10.1111/all.12881.
3. Lee CE, Zembower TR, Fotis MA, Postelnick MJ, Greenberger PA, Peterson LR, Noskin GA. The incidence of antimicrobial allergies in hospitalized patients: implications regarding prescribing patterns and emerging bacterial resistance. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160(18): 2819–22. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2819.
4. Macy E, Poon K-YT. Self-reported antibiotic allergy incidence and prevalence: age and sex effects. Am J Med. 2009; 122: 778e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.034.
5. Blumenthal KG, Shenoy ES. Penicillin allergy in pregnancy. JAMA. 2020; 323 (12): 1216. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.19809.
6. Korobkov NA,Bakulina NV, Repina MA, Arnt OS. Praktika naznacheniia antimikrobnykh preparatov beremennym s soputstvuiushchimi somaticheskimi zabolevaniiami. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia. 2023; 2: 118–124. (In Russ.)]. doi: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.308.
7. Nair LG, Mustafa SS, Ramsey A. Obstetric penicillin allergy evaluations. J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024; 4 (1): 100376. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100376.
8. Kwah JH, Burn MS, Liao J, Cate J, Son M. Outpatient penicillin allergy evaluation during pregnancy and associated clinical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022; 4 (5): 100674. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100674.
9. Patel V, Gleeson PK, Delaney K, Ralston SJ, Feldman S, Fadugba O. Safety and outcomes of penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnant women. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022; 128 (5): 568–574. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.01.032.
10. Lee EY, Copaescu AM, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ, Wolfson AR, Ramsey A. Drug allergy in women. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023; 11 (12): 3615–3623. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.09.031.
11. Castells M, Giannetti MP, Hamilton MJ, Novak P, Pozdnyakova O, Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, et al. Mast cell activation syndrome: Current understanding and research needs. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024;154 (2): 255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.05.025.
12. Foer D, Wien M, Karlson EW, Song W, Boyce JA, Brennan PJ. Patient characteristics associated with reactions to Mrgprx2-activating drugs in an electronic health record-linked biobank. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023; 11 (2): 492–499.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.001.
13. Romodanovsky DP, Goryachev DV, Khokhlov AL, Miroshnikov AE. Influence of sex differences on pharmacokinetics of drugs within the framework of bioequivalence studies of generic medicinal products. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2018; 3 (5): 94–105. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2018-3.5.15.
14. Chiarella SE, Buchheit KM, Foer D. Progestogen hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023; 11 (12): 3606–3613.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.050.
15. Jensen-Jarolim E, Untersmayr E. Gender-medicine aspects in allergology. Allergy. 2008; 63 (5): 610–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01645.x.
16. Galkina DE, Makarenko TA, Okladnikov DV. Immunological Aspects of Normal and Pathological Pregnancy. Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2022; 77 (1): 13–24 (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn1507
17. Kuder MM, Baird R, Hopkins M, Lang DM. Anaphylaxis in pregnancy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2023; 43 (1): 103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.07.004.
18. Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG. Evaluation and management of penicillin allergy: a review. JAMA. 2019; 321 (2): 188–199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19283.
19. Trubiano JA, Adkinson NF, Phillips EJ. Penicillin allergy is not necessarily forever. JAMA. 2017; 318 (1): 82–83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6510.
20. Sacco KA, Bates A, Brigham TJ, Imam JS, Burton MC. Clinical outcomes following inpatient penicillin allergy testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2017; 72 (9): 1288–1296. doi: 10.1111/all.13168.
21. Cook E, Ramirez M, Turrentine M. Time has come for routine penicillin allergy testing in obstetrics. AJP Rep. 2020; 10 (1): e15–e19. doi: 10.1055/s0039-3401801.
22. Harris BS, Hopkins MK, Villers MS, Weber JM, Pieper C, Grotegut CA, et al. Efficacy of non-beta-lactam antibiotics for prevention of cesarean delivery surgical site infections. AJP Rep. 2019; 9 (2): e167–e171. doi: 10.1055/s0039-1685503.
23. Desai SH, Kaplan MS, Chen Q, Macy EM. Morbidity in pregnant women associated with unverified penicillin allergies, antibiotic use, and Group B streptococcus infections. Perm J. 2017; 21: 16–080. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-080.
24. Buckey TM, Gleeson PK, Curley CM, Feldman SF, Apter AJ, Fadugba OO. Demographic characteristics associated with a penicillin allergy label during pregnancy. Front Allergy. 2024; 5: 1511392. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1511392.
25. Unanyan AL, Snarskaya ES, Lomonosov KM. Role of sexually transmitted infections in the development of female infertility. Therapeutic and preventive strategies. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2014; 17 (5): 59–62. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.17816/dv36940.
26. Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021; 70 (4): 1–187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1.
27. Committee opinion 797: prevention of Group B Streptococcal EarlyOnset disease in newborns: correction. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: 978–9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003668.
28. Prevention of Group B streptococcal early-onset disease in newborns. Pediatrics. 2019. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1882.
29. Prevention of Group B streptococcal early-onset disease in newborns: ACOG committee opinion, number 797. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: e51–72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003668.
30. Shmakov RG, Novikova SV, Il’yashenko EN, Logutova LS. Cesarean section in modern obstetrics: problems and ways to overcome them. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025; 25 (4): 5–18. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush2025250415.
31. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin 199: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132: e103–19. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002833.
32. Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Maternal obesity and risk of postcesarean wound complications. Am J Perinatol. 2014; 31 (4): 299–304. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1348402.
33. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 J; 66 (1): 1.
34. Practice bulletin 199: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery: correction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 134: 883–4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003499.
35. Mercer BM, Miodovnik M, Thurnau GR, et al. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. A randomized controlled trial. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. JAMA. 1997; 278 (12): 989–95.
36. Committee opinion 712: intrapartum management of intraamniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: e95–101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002833.
37. Breastfeeding Challenges: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 820. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137 (2): e42–e53. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004253.
38. Duffy CR, Huang Y, Andrikopoulou M, Stern-Ascher CN, Wright JD, Goffman D, et al. Clindamycin, gentamicin, and risk of clostridium difficile infection and acute kidney injury during delivery hospitalizations. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135 (1): 59–67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003568.
39. Mahamid A, Wainstock T, Sheiner E, Rosenberg E, Kluwgant D, Pariente G. Perinatal outcome and long-term infectious hospitalizations of offspring born to women with known drug allergy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2022; 88 (5): e13608. doi: 10.1111/aji.13608.
40. Azmy V, Lundsberg LS, Culhane J, Kwah J, Partridge C, Son M. Pregnant Patients with a documented history of penicillin allergy and associated maternal and neonatal outcomes at a tertiary care center. Am J Perinatol. 2024; 41 (S 01): e2051–e2057. doi: 10.1055/a-2096-5002.
41. Blumenthal KG, Ryan EE, Li Y, Lee H, Kuhlen JL, Shenoy ES. The impact of a reported penicillin allergy on surgical site infection risk. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18; 66 (3): 329–336. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix794.
42. Hopkins MK, Dotters-Katz S, Boggess K, Heine RP, Smid M. Perioperative antibiotic choice in labored versus unlabored cesareans and risk of postcesarean infectious morbidity. Am J Perinatol. 2018; 35 (2): 127–133. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606187.
43. Lange SM, Sharpe EE, Hertzfeldt DN, Schroeder DR, Sviggum HP. Effect of penicillin allergy on prophylactic antibiotic administration in the parturient undergoing cesarean delivery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021; 65 (3): 329–334. doi: 10.1111/aas.13730.
44. Abu Shqara R, Or S, Goldinfeld G, Lowenstein L, Frank Wolf M. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with intrapartum antibiotic regimens in women with prolonged membrane rupture and unknown Group B Streptococcus status: a retrospective comparative study. 2025. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2026; 91 (2): 172–179. doi: 10.1159/000546792.
45. Siegel AM, Heine RP, Dotters-Katz SK. The effect of non-penicillin antibiotic regimens on neonatal outcomes in preterm premature rupture of membranes. AJP Rep. 2019; 9 (1): e67–e71. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683378.
46. Wang LA, Baer RJ, Namazy JA, Chambers CD. Maternal penicillin allergy and infant outcomes: Results from a large administrative cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024; 12 (4): 1080–1082.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.12.009.
47. Kirven J, Beddow D, Patel L, Smith C, Booker KS, Dawud B, St Hill CA. Outcomes in reported penicillin allergic mothers and neonates requiring Group B streptococcal prophylaxis: a retrospective observational cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2021; 21 (1): 327. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02797-8.
48. Snider JB, Mithal LB, Kwah JH, Rhodes NJ, Son M. Antibiotic choice for Group B Streptococcus prophylaxis in mothers with reported penicillin allergy and associated newborn outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23 (1): 400. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05697-0.
49. Kelkar PS, Li JT. Cephalosporin allergy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345 (11): 804–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra993637.
50. Zagursky RJ, Pichichero ME. Cross-reactivity in β-lactam allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018; 6 (1): 72–81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.027.
51. Macy E, Blumenthal KG. Are cephalosporins safe for use in penicillin allergy without prior allergy evaluation? J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018; 6 (1): 82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.033.
52. Annè S, Reisman RE. Risk of administering cephalosporin antibiotics to patients with histories of penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995; 74 (2): 167–70.
53. Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL, Bourke J, Yun J, Douglas A, et al. Development and validation of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180 (5): 745–752. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403.
54. Blumenthal KG, Huebner EM, Fu X, Li Y, Bhattacharya G, Levin AS, et al. Risk-based pathway for outpatient penicillin allergy evaluations. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019; 7 (7): 2411–2414.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.006.
55. Devchand M, Urbancic KF, Khumra S, Douglas AP, Smibert O, Cohen E, et al. Pathways to improved antibiotic allergy and antimicrobial stewardship practice: the validation of a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy assessment tool. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019; 7 (3): 1063–1065.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.07.048.
56. Moskow JM, Cook N, Champion-Lippmann C, Amofah SA, Garcia AS. Identifying opportunities in EHR to improve the quality of antibiotic allergy data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23 (e1): e108–12. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv139.
57. Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters. American academy of Allergy, asthma and immunology, American college of Allergy, asthma and immunology, joint Council of Allergy, asthma and immunology. Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010; 105: 259–73. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002.
58. Macy E. Penicillin skin testing in pregnant women with a history of penicillin allergy and group B streptococcus colonization. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006; 97 (2): 164–8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60007-5.
59. Kuder MM, Lennox MG, Li M, Lang DM, Pien L. Skin testing and oral amoxicillin challenge in the outpatient allergy and clinical immunology clinic in pregnant women with penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020; 125 (6): 646–651. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.012.
60. Desravines N, Waldron J, Venkatesh KK, Kwan M, Boggess KA. Outpatient penicillin allergy testing in pregnant women who report an allergy. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137 (1): 56–61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004213.
61. Wolfson AR, Mancini CM, Banerji A, Fu X, Bryant AS, Phadke NA, et al. Penicillin allergy assessment in pregnancy: safety and impact on antibiotic use. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021; 9 (3): 1338–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.063.
62. Godfrey K, McDanel D, Percival K, Bowdler N, Santillan D, Dowden A. Screening for penicillin allergy in obstetric patients to optimize guideline directed therapy. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025; 5 (1): e125. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10033.
63. Zhang BY, Paquette V, McClymont E, Barlas A, Wong T, Watt M, et al. Implementing a penicillin allergy delabeling service for the obstetric population. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021; 9 (6): 2501–2502.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.023.
64. Patrawala S, Mustafa SS, Kraude R, Ramsey A. A Randomized trial comparing direct challenges to penicillin skin testing for outpatient lowrisk penicillin allergy evaluations in pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025; 13 (9): 2405–2410.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.003.
65. Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA, et al. Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022; 150 (6): 1333–1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028.
66. Mak R, Yuan Zhang B, Paquette V, Erdle SC, Van Schalkwyk JE, Wong T, Watt M, Elwood C. Safety of direct oral challenge to amoxicillin in pregnant patients at a Canadian tertiary hospital. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022; 10 (7): 1919–1921.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.03.025.
67. Copaescu AM, Vogrin S, James F, Chua KYL, Rose MT, De Luca J, et al. Efficacy of a clinical decision rule to enable direct oral challenge in patients with low-risk penicillin allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2023; 183 (9): 944–952. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2986.
68. Shanahan M, Gerjevic KA, Emeny RT, Considine E, Considine E, Trevino E, et al. Improving antibiotic use during delivery hospitalization with the use of penicillin allergy testing in prenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023; 5: 100765. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100765.
69. Simons FE, Schatz M. Anaphylaxis during pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130 (3): 597–606. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.06.035.
70. Jeon HJ, Ryu A, Min J, Kim NS. Maternal anaphylactic shock in pregnancy: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97 (37): e12351. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012351.
71. Tsuzuki Y, Narita M, Nawa M, Nakagawa U, Wakai T. Management of maternal anaphylaxis in pregnancy: a case report. Acute Med Surg. 2016; 4 (2): 202–204. doi: 10.1002/ams2.238.
72. Phadke NA, Wolfson AR, Mancini C, Fu X, Goldstein SA, Ngo J, et al. Electronic consultations in allergy/immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019; 7 (8): 2594–2602. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.039.
73. Gleeson PK, Rizwan M, Apter AJ, Katsnelson M, Curley CM, Fadugba OO. Demographic factors associated with penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024; 12 (2): 526–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.025.
Review
For citations:
Enikeev DA, Bazaliy MG, Pilyasova AD, Ignatenko AI, Tokova MA, Pacheva AK, Nersisyan SK, Aleksandrov EA, Anisimova IR, Alibekova TS, Zaikin AA, Kuznetsova EA, Burnysheva VA. Verification of Penicillin Allergy in Obstetric Practice as a Tool for Rational Antibiotic Therapy. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2026;71(3-4):70-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2026-71-3-4-70-83. EDN: TKVLEU
JATS XML
















































