Preview

Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy

Advanced search

Antibiotic Resistance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated at Hospitals of St. Petersburg and Moscow

Abstract

Antibiotic susceptibility of 119 coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated at hospitals of St. Petersburg and Moscow was investigated and estimated at the local laboratories as oxacillin resistant. The following species were identified: Staphylococcus epidermidis, S.haemolyticus, S. hominis, S.capitis, S.simulans, S.pettenkoferi, S.lentus, S.carnosus and S.warneri. The oxacillin resistance was confirmed in 79.8% of the isolates. The frequency of the associated resistance to non-beta-lactams was much higher in the oxacillin resistant isolates vs. the oxacillin susceptible ones. When the CLSI and EUCAST susceptibility criteria were used, 1-3% difference in the resistance levels was recorded. Among the oxacillin resistant isolates the frequency of resistance to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, moxifloxacin, tetracycline and clindamycin equaled 90, 88, 88, 63, 43 and 26% respectively. Two linezolid resistant isolates of S.epidermidis with lower susceptibility to tedizolid were isolated. Eight isolates of S.epidermidis showed lower resistance to mupirocin. The MIC of ceftarolin for oxacillin resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci varied from 0.5 to 2.0 mcg/ml, while for the oxacillin susceptible ones it was lower than 0.25 mcg/ml. No resistance to tigecyclin and vancomycin was observed.

About the Authors

V. V. Gostev
Research Institute of Children's Infections, Federal Medico-Biological Agency
Russian Federation


O. S. Kalinogorskaya
Research Institute of Children's Infections, Federal Medico-Biological Agency
Russian Federation


A. N. Kruglov
National Agency for Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy
Russian Federation


S. V. Sidorenko
Research Institute of Children's Infections, Federal Medico-Biological Agency
Russian Federation


References

1. Fairbrother R.W. Coagulase production as a criterion for the classification of the staphylococci. J Pathol Bacteriol 1940: 50; 1: 83-88.

2. Becker K., Heilmann C., Peters G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clinical Microbiol Reviews 2014; 27: 4: 870-926.

3. Сидоренко C.B. и др. Результаты многоцентрового исследования чувствительности стафилококков к антибиотикам в Москве и Санкт-Петербурге. Антибиотики и химиотер 1998; 43: 7: 15-25.

4. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0, 2015. http://www.eucast.org.

5. CLSI. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-fourth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute; 2014. 2014.

6. Aguado J.M., Ponte C., Soriano F. Bacteriuria with a multiply resistant species of Corynebacterium (Corynebacterium group D2): an unnoticed cause of urinary tract infection. J Infect Dis 1987. 156: 1: 144-150.

7. Leclercq R. et al. EUCAST expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 2: 141-160.

8. Thomas C. M. et al. Resistance to and synthesis of the antibiotic mupirocin. Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010; 8: 4: 281-289.

9. Swenson J.M. et al. Correlation of cefoxitin MICs with the presence of mecA in Staphylococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 6: 1902-1905.

10. Mencacci A. et al. Comparison of the BD Phoenix system with the cefoxitin disk diffusion test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 7: 2288-2291.

11. Tewhey R. et al. Mechanisms of linezolid resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci determined by whole-genome sequencing. mBio 2014; 5: 3.


Review

For citations:


Gostev V.V., Kalinogorskaya O.S., Kruglov A.N., Sidorenko S.V. Antibiotic Resistance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated at Hospitals of St. Petersburg and Moscow. Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2015;60(9-10):23-28. (In Russ.)

Views: 1015


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-2990 (Print)