Preview

Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy

Advanced search

Activity of Cefiderocol and Other New Antibiotics Against Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains

https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2022-67-11-12-16-21

Abstract

Background. The spread of extensive drug-resistance among gram-negative bacteria calls for the search for antimicrobics with new mechanisms of actions.

The aim was to assess susceptibility of extensively drug-resistant K. pneumoniae strains to cefiderocol and other new inhibitor-protected β-lactams, and to determine genetic mechanisms of antibiotic resistance.

Methods. This study included 30 extensively drug-resistant K. pneumoniae strains collected in 2016–2021 from 4 regions of Belarus. Carbapenemase genes were detected by real-time PCR. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for cefiderocol and other new antibiotics were assessed by microdilution method using the Sensititre system. Whole genome sequencing was performed for 2 resistant and 3 cefiderocol-susceptible strains. Genome assemblies and annotation were performed using UGENE v. 37.0 software. Nucleotide sequences were translated using CLC  Sequence Viewer v. 8.0 (QIAGEN) package. The PROVEAN software was used to assess amino asides substitutions and their influence on the functional activity of proteins.

Results. KPC carbapenemase-producers were 4 strains, OXA-48 — 17, KPC+OXA-48 — 1, NDM — 7, OXA-48 + NDM — 1. All KPC-producers were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam was noted in all NDM  producers and OXA-48+NDM  co-producer. The study has identified 9 cefiderocol-resistant strains. These were NDM and OXA-48-producers isolated from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection from 3 regions of Belarus. Resistant strains had functionally significant nonsynonymous  substitutions in the genes of TonB-dependent receptors for catecholate siderophores FepA (F472V, P64S) and Fiu (T92S).

Conclusion. The study has shown high efficacy of new inhibitor-protected carbapenems and cephalosporins against certain types of carbapenemase-producers. Strains with mutational resistance to cefiderocol, an antibiotic not previously used in Belarus, have been identified.

About the Authors

E. V. Karpova
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus

Elena V. Karpova — assistant of the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, Gomel State Medical University.

5 Lange st., Gomel, 246050

Scopus Author ID: 57318423400


Competing Interests:

None



D. V. Tapalski
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus

Dmitry V. Tapalski — D. Sc. in medicine, Head of the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, Gomel State Medical University.

5 Lange st., Gomel, 246050

Scopus Author ID: 6506992098


Competing Interests:

None



References

1. Kelly A.M., Mathema B., Larson E.L. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the community: a scoping review. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017; 50 (2): 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.012.

2. Petrovskaya T.A., Karpova E.V., Tapalski D.V., Mozharovskaya L.V., Baranov O.Y. Molecular-genetic mechanisms of resistance of nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae strains to polymyxins and antibiotics of other groups according to whole genome sequencing data. Vestnik VSMU. 2021; 20 (5): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2021.5.34 (in Russian)

3. Duin D., Doi Y. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence. 2017; 8 (4): 460–469. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1222343.

4. Sousa A., Pérez-Rodríguez M.T., Soto A., Rodríguez L., Pérez-Landeiro A., Martínez-Lamas L. et al. Effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam as salvage therapy for treatment of infections due to OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73 (11): 3170–3175. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky295.

5. Bassetti M., Giacobbe D.R., Patel N., Tillotson G., Massey J. Efficacy and safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam versus best available therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections in patients without prior antimicrobial failure: A Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2019; 36 (7): 1771–1777. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y.

6. Vena A., Castaldo N., Bassetti M. The role of new β-lactamase inhibitors in gram-negative infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019; 32 (6): 638–646. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000600.

7. Kohira N., West J., Ito A., Ito-Horiyama T., Nakamura R., Sato T. et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a siderophore cephalosporin, S-649266, against Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates, including carbapenem-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60 (2): 729–734. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01695-15.

8. Karlowsky J.A., Hackel M.A., Tsuji M., Yamano Y., Echols R., Sahm D.F. In vitro activity of cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, against gramnegative bacilli isolated by Clinical Laboratories in North America and Europe in 2015–2016: SIDERO-WT-2015. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019; 53 (4): 456–466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.11.007.

9. Naseer S., Weinstein E.A., Rubin D.B., Suvarna K., Wei X., Higgins K. et al. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): benefit-risk considerations for Cefiderocol (Fetroja). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; 72 (12): e1103–1111. doi: /10.1093/cid/ciaa1799.

10. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 12.0, 2022. https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/

11. Okonechnikov K., Golosova O., Fursov M. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28 (8): 1166–1167. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091.

12. Ito A., Sato T., Ota M., Takemura M., Nishikawa T., Toba S. et al. In vitro antibacterial properties of Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, against Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62 (1): e01454-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01454-17.

13. Iregui A., Khan Z., Landman D., Quale J. Activity of Cefiderocol against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii Endemic to Medical Centers in New York City. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2020; 26 (7): 722–726. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0298.

14. Leonov V.V., Mironov A.Jyu., Anan'ina I.V., Rubal'skaya E.E, Sentjyurova L.G. Mikrobnye siderofory: stroenie, svojstva i funktsii. Astrakhanskij meditsinskij zhurnal. 2016; 11 (4): 24–37. (in Russian)

15. Wang Q., Jin L., Sun S., Yin Y., Wang R., Chen F. et al. Occurrence of high levels of Cefiderocol resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli before its approval in China: a report from China CRE-Network. Tyne DV, editor. Microbiol Spectr. 2022; e02670-21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02670-21.

16. Klein S., Boutin S., Kocer K., Fiedler M.O., Storzinger D., Weigand M.A. et al. Rapid development of cefiderocol resistance in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae during therapy is associated with heterogeneous mutations in the catecholate siderophore receptor cirA. Clin Infect Dis. 2022; 74 (5): 905–908. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab511.

17. McElheny C.L, Fowler E.L, Iovleva A., Shields R.K., Doi Y. In vitro evolution of Cefiderocol resistance in an NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae due to functional loss of CirA. Goldberg JB, editor. Microbiol Spectr. 2021; 9 (3): e01779-21. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01779-21.

18. Nordmann P., Shields R.K., Doi Y., Takemura M., Echols R., Matsunaga Y. et al. Mechanisms of reduced susceptibility to Cefiderocol among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2022; 28 (4): 398–407. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0180.


Review

For citations:


Karpova E.V., Tapalski D.V. Activity of Cefiderocol and Other New Antibiotics Against Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains. Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2022;67(11-12):16-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2022-67-11-12-16-21

Views: 721


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-2990 (Print)