Биоразнообразие и антимикробный потенциал ацидофильных и ацидотолерантных актиномицетов
https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2024-69-11-12-101-109
EDN: BVSMZU
Аннотация
Распространение антибиотикорезистентности патогенных микроорганизмов — одна из главных проблем современной медицины. В связи с особенностями метаболизма экстремофильных микроорганизмов, поиск продуцентов новых антимикробных соединений среди экстремофильных актиномицетов вполне обоснован. В обзоре рассмотрены ацидофильные и ацидотолерантные актиномицеты, которые являются неотъемлемой частью микробиомов кислых почв и, как показывают исследования, обладают высоким антимикробным потенциалом.
Ключевые слова
При поддержке: Работа выполнена в рамках государственного задания ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт по изысканию новых антибиотиков им. Г. Ф. Гаузе»
Об авторах
А. В. Чумак
ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт по изысканию новых антибиотиков им. Г.Ф. Гаузе»
Россия
Конфликт интересов:
Россия
Чумак Анастасия Владимировна — аспирант, инженер лаборатории таксономического изучения и коллекции культур микроорганизмов.
Москва
Конфликт интересов:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, связанных с публикацией настоящей статьи
О. Н. Синёва
ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт по изысканию новых антибиотиков им. Г.Ф. Гаузе»
Россия
Конфликт интересов:
Россия
Синёва Ольга Николаевна — к. б. н., научный сотрудник лаборатории таксономического изучения и коллекции культур микроорганизмов.
Москва
Конфликт интересов:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, связанных с публикацией настоящей статьи
Список литературы
1. Barka E. A., Vatsa P., Sanchez L., Gaveau-Vaillant N., Jacquard C., Klenk H.-P. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016; 80 (1): 1–43. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00019-15.
2. Ludwig W., Euzéby J., Schumann P., Buss H.-J., Trujillo M. E., Kämpfer P. et al. Road map of the phylum Actinobacteria. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Springer, New York, NY. 2012; 1–28. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-68233-4_1.
3. Oren A., Garrity G. M. Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2021; 71 (10). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005056.
4. Tiwari K., Gupta R. K. Diversity and isolation of rare actinomycetes: an overview. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013; 39 (3): 256–294. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2012.709819.
5. Щекотихин А. Е., Олсуфьева Е. Н., Янковская В. С. Антибиотики и родственные соединения. М.: Лаборатория знаний. 2022.
6. Hutchings M. I., Truman A. W., Wilkinson B. Antibiotics: past, present and future. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019; 51: 72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.008.
7. Aminov R. I. A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learned and challenges for the future. Front Microbiol. 2010. 1: 1–7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00134.
8. Bérdy J. Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and where we are heading. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2012; 65 (8): 385–395. doi: 10.1038/ja.2012.27.
9. Grasso L. L., Martino D. C., Alduina R. Production of antibacterial compounds from Actinomycetes. In Actinobacteria-Basics and Biotechnological Applications. 2016; 214 (11): 272–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.5772/61525.
10. Giddings L.-A. and Newman D. J. Bioactive compounds from terrestrial extremophiles. Extremophilic Bacteria. 2015; 1–75. doi: doi: 10.1007/9783-319-13260-0.
11. Shivlata L., Satyanarayana T. Thermophilic and alkaliphilic Actinobacteria: biology and potential applications. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01014.
12. Rampelotto P. H. Extremophiles and extreme environments. Life. 2013; 3: 482–485. doi: 10.3390/life3030482.
13. Corke C. T. Chase F. E. Comparative studies of Actinomycete populations in acid podzolic and neutral mull forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1964; 28: 68–70. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800010034x.
14. Davies F. L., Williams, S. T. Studies on the ecology of Actinomycetes in soils I. The occurrence and distribution of actinomycetes in a pine forest soil. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 1970; 2: 227–238. doi: /10.1016/0038-0717(70)90029-5.
15. Williams S. T., Davies F. L., Mayfield C. I., Khan M. R. Studies on the ecology of Actinomycetes in soils II. The pH requirements of Streptomyces from two acid soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1971; 3: 187–195. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(71)90014-9.
16. Khan M. R., Williams S. T. Studies on the ecology of actinomycetes in soil — VIII: Distribution and characterictics of acidophilic actinomycetes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1975; 7: 345–349. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(75)90047-4.
17. Williams S. T., Flowers T. H. The influence of pH on starch hydrolysis by neutrophilic and acidophilic streptomycetes. Microbios. 1978; 20 (80): 99–106.
18. Williams S. T., Robinson C. S. The role of streptomycetes in decomposition of chitin in acidic soils. Journal of General Microbiology. 1981; 127: 55–63. doi: 10.1099/00221287-127-1-55.
19. Зенова Г. М., Закалюкина Ю. В., Селянин В. В., Звягинцев Д. Г. Выделение и рост почвенных ацидофильных актиномицетов рода Micromonospora. Почвоведение. 2004; 7: 874–852.
20. Zenova G. M., Zakalyukina Yu. V., Zvyagintsev D. G. Acidotolerant actinomycetes in soils. Eurasian Soil Science. 2000; 33 (9): 975–977.
21. Muramatsu H., Murakami R., Ibrahim Z. H., Murakami K., Shahab N., Nagai K. Phylogenetic diversity of acidophilic actinomycetes from Malaysia. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2011; 64: 621–624. doi: 10.1038/ja.2011.57. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
22. Dorchenkova Yu. A., Gracheva T. A., Lysak L. V. Characteristics of the complexes of actinomycetes in the Pu Hoat Nature Reserve. Eurasian Soil Science. 2022; 55 (4): 485–489. doi: 10.1134/S106422932204007X.
23. Kim S. B., Lonsdale J., Seong C-N., Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus gen. nov., acidophilic actinomycetes with wall chemotype I and emendation of the family Streptomycetaceae (Waksman and Henrici (1943) AL) emend. Rainey et al. 1997. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2003; 83: 107–116. doi: 10.1023/a:1023397724023.
24. Goodfellow M., Kämpfer P., Busse H.-J., Trujillo M. E., Suzuki K., Ludwig W. et al. editors. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd ed. Volume 5: The Actinobacteria. 2012.
25. Закалюкина Ю. В., Зенова Г. М. Антагонистические свойства почвенных ацидофильных актиномицетов. Известия Российской академии наук. Серия биологическая. 2007; 4: 402–405.
26. Hwang S., Yun Y., Won Hoon Choi W. H., Kim S. B., Shin J., Lee M. J., et al. Acidiphilamides A−E, modified peptides as autophagy inhibitors from an acidophilic actinobacterium, Streptacidiphilus rugosus. J Nat Prod. 2019; 82 (2): 341–348. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b00828.
27. Eftekharivash L. Hamedi J., Zarrini Gh., Bakhtiari R. Acidophilic and acid tolerant actinobacteria as new sources of antimicrobial agents against Helicobacter pylori. Arch Razi Inst. 2021; 76 (2): 261–272. doi: 10.22092/ari.2019.128039.1401.
28. Malik A., Kim Y. R., Kim S. B. Genome mining of the genus Streptacidiphilus for biosynthetic and biodegradation potential. Genes (Basel). 2020; 11 (10): 1166. doi: 10.3390/genes11101166.
29. Golinska P., Kim B.-Y., Dahm H., Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus hamsterleyensis sp. nov., isolated from a spruce forest soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013; 104: 965–972. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-0015-1.
30. Zakalyukina Yu. V., Zenova G. M., Zvyagintsev D. G. Peculiarities of growth and morphological differentiation of acidophilic and neutrophilic soil streptomycetes. Microbiology. 2004; 73 (1): 89–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICI.0000016372.52239.dd.
31. Cho S.-H., Han J.-H., Seong C. N., Kim S. B. Phylogenetic diversity of acidophilic sporoactinobacteria isolated from various soils. J Microbiol. 2006; 44 (6): 600–606.
32. Nion I., Osada M., Yamamura T., Muramatsu R. Acidophilic and acidtolerant actinomycetes in an acid tea field soil. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 1995; 41: 175–180. doi: 10.22092/ari.2019.128039.1401.
33. Kim M. J., Roh S. G., Kim M.-K., Park Ch., Kim S., Kim S. B. Kitasatospora acidiphila sp. nov., isolated from pine grove soil, exhibiting antimicrobial potential. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020; 70 (10). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004450.
34. Oyuntsetseg B., Cho S.-H., Jeon S. J., Lee H. B., Shin K.-S., Kim In.-S., et al. Amycolatopsis acidiphila sp. nov., a moderately acidophilic species isolated from coal mine soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017; 67 (9): 3387–3392. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002126.
35. Poomthongdee N., Duangmal K., Pathom-aree W. Acidophilic actinomycetes from rhizosphere soil: diversity and properties beneficial to plants. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2015; 68: 106–114. doi: 10.1038/ja.2014.117.
36. Golinska P., Ahmed L., Wang D., Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus durhamensis sp. nov., isolated from a spruce forest soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013; 104: 199–206. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9938-9.
37. Гаузе Г. Ф., Преображенская М. А., Терехова Л. П., Максимова Т. С. Определитель актиномицетов. М.: Наука; 1983.
38. Niyasom C., Boonmak S., Meesri N. Antimicrobial activity of acidophilic actinomycetes isolated from acidic soil. KMITL Science and Technology Journal. 2015; 15 (2): 62–69.
39. Golinska P., Zucchi T. D., Silva L., Dahm H. Goodfellow M. Actinospica durhamensis sp. nov., isolated from a spruce forest soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2015; 108: 435–442. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0496-1.
40. Busti E., Cavaletti L., Monciardini P., Schumann P., Rohde M., Sosio M. et al. Catenulispora acidiphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel, mycelium-forming actinomycete, and proposal of Catenulisporaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56 (8): 1741–1746. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63858-0.
41. Cavaletti L. Monciardini P., Schumann P., Rohde M., Bamonte R., Busti E., Sosio M. et al. Actinospica robiniae gen. nov., sp. nov. and Actinospica acidiphila sp. nov.: proposal for Actinospicaceae fam. nov. and Catenulisporinae subord. nov. in the order Actinomycetales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56 (8): 1747–1753. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63859-0.
42. Teo W. F. A., Lipun K., Nantana Srisuk N., Duangmal K. Amycolatopsis acididurans sp. nov., isolated from peat swamp forest soil in Thailand. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2021; 74: 199–205. doi: 10.1038/s41429-020-00382-2.
43. Xu C., Wang L., Cui Q., Huang Y., Liu Z., Zheng G., Goodfellow M. Neutrotolerant acidophilic Streptomyces species isolated from acidic soils in China: Streptomyces guanduensis sp. nov., Streptomyces paucisporeus sp. nov., Streptomyces rubidus sp. nov. and Streptomyces yanglinensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56: 1109–1115. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63959-0.
44. Huang Y., Qingfeng Cui Q., Wang L., Carlos Rodriguez C., Quintana E., Goodfellow M., et al. Streptacidiphilus jiangxiensis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from acidic rhizosphere soil in China. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2004; 86: 159–165. doi: 10.1023/B:ANTO.0000036124.18820.ae.
45. Kusuma A. B., Putra K. E., Vanggy L. R., Loh J., Imen Nouioui I., Goodfellow M. Actinospica acidithermotolerans sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from sediment from an Indonesian hot spring. Arch Microbiol. 2022; 204 (518). doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03058-7.
46. Teo W. F. A., Srisuk N., Duangmal K. Amycolatopsis acidicola sp. nov., isolated from peat swamp forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020; 70 (3): 1547–1554. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003933.
47. Tamura T., Ishida Y., Otoguro M., Suzuki K. Catenulispora subtropica sp. nov. and Catenulispora yoronensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008; 58 (7): 1552–1555. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65561-0.
48. Guo X., Zhang L., Li X., Gao Y., Ruan J., Huang Y. Streptomyces rubrisoli sp. nov., neutrotolerant acidophilic actinomycetes isolated from red soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015; 65 (9): 3103–3108. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000383.
49. Numan M., Saleem M., Nawaz S., Nosheen S., Sajid I. Acidophilic Acti- nobacteria: isolation, taxonomic characterization and bioactivity against multidrug resistant pathogens. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2022; 20 (1). doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2022-20.1.0013.
50. Euanorasetr J., Chotboonprasit V., Ngoennamchok W., Thongprathueang S., Promprateep A., Taweesaga S. et al. Isolation and characterization of aerobic actinomycetes with probiotic properties in Nile tilapia. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2020; 10 (9): 40–49. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2020.10905.
51. Veyisoglu A., Tatar D. Screening of acidophilic actinobacteria that show activity against paddy pest fungi. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences. 2021; 5 (3): 425–432. doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2021.3.22.
52. Budhathoki S., Shrestha A. Screening of actinomycetes from soil for antibacterial activity. Nepal Journal of Biotechnology. 2020; 8 (3): 102–110. doi: 10.3126/njb.v8i3.33664.
53. Zakalyukina Yu. V., Zenova G. M., Zvyagintsev D. G. Acidophilic soil actinomycetes. Microbiology. 2002; 71 (3): 342–345. doi: 10.1023/A:1015819131117.
54. Golinska P., Wang D., Goodfellow M. Nocardia aciditolerans sp. nov., isolated from a spruce forest soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013; 103: 1079–1088. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9887-3.
55. Cui Q., Wang L., Ying Huang Y., Liu Z., Goodfellow M. Nocardia jiangxiensis sp. nov. and Nocardia miyunensis sp. nov., isolated from acidic soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005; 55: 1921–1925. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63644-0.
56. George M., Anjumol A., George G., Hatha A. A. M. Distribution and bioactive potential of soil actinomycetes from different ecological habitats. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012; 6 (10): 2265–2271. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.856.
57. Monciardini P., Cavaletti L., Ranghetti A., Schumann P., Rohde M., Bamonte R., et al. Novel members of the family Micromonosporaceae, Rugosimonospora acidiphila gen. nov., sp. nov. and Rugosimonospora africana sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59 (11): 2752–2758. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.010231-0.
58. Soledad M., Gurovic V., Muller S., Nicole Domin N., Seccareccia I., Nietzsche S., et al. Micromonospora schwarzwaldensis sp. nov., a producer of telomycin, isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013; 63 (10): 3812–3817. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.051623-0.
59. Zenova G. M., Manucharova N. A., Zvyagintsev D. G. Extremophilic and extremotolerant actinomycetes in different soil types. Eurasian Soil Science. 2011; 44 (4). 417–436. doi: 10.1134/S1064229311040132.
60. Cho S.-H., Han J.-H., Ko H.-Y., Kim S. B. Streptacidiphilus anmyonensis sp. nov., Streptacidiphilus rugosus sp. nov. and Streptacidiphilus melanogenes sp. nov., acidophilic actinobacteria isolated from Pinus soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol.2008; 58 (7): 1566–1570. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65480-0.
61. Roh S. G., Kim M.-K., Park S., Yun B.-R., Park J., Kim M. J., et al. Streptacidiphilus pinicola sp. nov., isolated from pine grove soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018; 68 (9): 3149–3155. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002957.
62. Swiecimska M., Golinska P., Sangal V., Wachnowicz B., Goodfellow M. Streptantibioticus silvisoli sp. nov., acidotolerant actinomycetes from pine litter, reclassification of Streptomyces cocklensis, Streptomyces ferralitis, Streptomyces parmotrematis and Streptomyces rubrisoli as Actinacidiphila cocklensis comb. nov., Streptantibioticus ferralitis comb. nov., Streptantibioticus parmotrematis comb. nov. and Streptantibioticus rubrisoli comb. nov., and emended descriptions of the genus Streptantibioticus, the family Streptomycetaceae and Streptomyces iconiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023; 73 (7). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005978.
63. Lee H.-J., Han S.-I., Whang K.-S. Catenulispora graminis sp. nov., a rhizobacterium from bamboo (Phyllostachys nigro var. henonis) rhizosphere soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012; 62 (11): 2589–2592. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.035501-0.
64. Huang M.-J., Rao M. P. N., Salam N., Xiao M., Huang H.-Q., Li W.-J. Allostreptomyces psammosilenae gen. nov., sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from the roots of Psammosilene tunicoides and emended description of the family Streptomycetaceae [Waksman and Henrici (1943)AL] emend. Rainey et al. 1997, emend. Kim et al. 2003, emend. Zhi et al. 2009. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017; 67 (2): 288–293. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001617.
65. Omura S., Takahashi Y., Iwai Y., Tanaka H. Kitasatosporia, a new genus of the order Actinomycetales. J Antibiot. 1982; 35: 1013–1019. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.35.1013.
66. Zhang Z., Wang Y., Ruan J. A proposal to revive the genus Kitasatospora (Omura, Takahashi, Iwai, and Tanaka 1982). Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47: 1048–1054. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1048.
67. Madhaiyan M., Saravanan V. S., See-Too W.-S., Volpiano C. G., Sant’Anna F. H., da Mota F. F. et al. Genomic and phylogenomic insights into the family Streptomycetaceae lead to the proposal of six novel genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022; 72 (10). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005570.
68. Yu B., Han C., Zhao J., Zhang Y., Shan Q., Wu Y., et al. Streptacidiphilus fuscans sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from the root of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021; 71 (6). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004824.
69. Song W., Duan L., Jin L., Zhao J., Jiang S., Sun T. et al. Streptacidiphilus monticola sp. nov., a novel actinomycetes isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018; 68: 1757–1761. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002751.
70. Wang L., Huang Y., Liu Z., Goodfellow M., Rodríguez C. Streptacidiphilus oryzae sp. nov., an actinomycetes isolated from rice-field soil in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56: 1257–1261. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64165-0.
71. Golinska P., Dahm H., Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus toruniensis sp. nov., isolated from a pine forest soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2016; 109: 1583–1591. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0759-5.
72. Kim B.-Y., Zucchi T. D., Fiedler H.-P., Goodfellow M. Streptomyces cocklensis sp. nov., a dioxamycin producing actinomycetes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012; 62: 279–283. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.029983-0.
73. Li C., Cao P., Jiang M., Sun T., Shen Y., Xiang W., et al. Streptomyces oryziradicis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere soil of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020; 70: 465–472. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003777.
74. Kim S. B., Seong C. N., Jeon S. J., Bae K. S., Goodfellow M. Taxonomic study of neutrotolerant acidophilic actinomycetes isolated from soil and description of Streptomyces yeochonensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004; 54: 211–214. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02519-0.
75. Chantavorakit T., Klaysubun C., Duangmal K. Streptomyces acididurans sp. nov., isolated from peat swamp forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021; 71 (7). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004849.
76. Somphong A., Poengsungnoen V., Buaruang K., Suriyachadkun C., Sripreechasak P., Tanasupawat S., Phongsopitanun W. Diversity of the culturable lichen-derived Actinobacteria and the taxonomy of Streptomyces parmotrematis sp. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2022; 115: 911–920. doi: 10.1007/s10482-022-01744-6.
77. Liu Z., Rodriguez C., Wang L., Quingfeng Cui Q., Huang Y., Quintana E. T. et al. Kitasatospora viridis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005; 55: 707–711. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63329-0.
78. Kim J.-J., Marjerrison C. E., Shartau S. L. C., Brady A. L., Sharp C. E., Rijpstra W. I. C., et al. Actinocrinis puniceicyclus gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from an acidic spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017; 67: 602–609. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001667.
79. Swiecimska M., Golinska P., Wypija M., Goodfellow M. Genomic-based classification of Catenulispora pinisilvae sp. nov., novella ctinobacteria isolated from a pine forest soil in Poland and emended description of Catenulispora rubra. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 2021; 44 (1): 126164. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126164.
80. Tamura T., Ishida Y., Sakane T., Suzuki K.-I. Catenulispora rubra sp. nov., an acidophilic actinomycete isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57 (10): 2272–2274. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65056-0.
81. Lee H.-J., Whang K.-S. Catenulispora fulva sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016; 66 (1): 271–275. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000711.
82. Nie G.-X., Ming H., Li S., Zhou E.-M., Cheng J., Tang X. et al. Amycolatopsis dongchuanensis sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012; 62: 2650–2656. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.038125-0.
83. Yallop C. A., Edwards C., Williams S. T. Isolation and growth physiology of novel thermoactinomycetes. J Appl Microbiol. 1997; 83: 685–692. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00282.x.
84. Rapoport D., Sagova-Mareckova M., Sedlacek I., Provaznik J., Kralova S., Pavlinic D., et al. Trebonia kvetii gen. nov., sp. nov., an acidophilic actinobacterium, and proposal of the new actinobacterial family Treboniaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020; 70: 5106–5114. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004388.
85. Zakalyukina Yu. V., Zenova G. M. Antagonistic Activity of soil acidophilic actinomycetes. Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol. 2007; 4: 402–405.
86. Busti E., Monciardini P., Cavaletti L., Bamonte R., Lazzarini A., Sosio M. et al. Antibiotic-producing ability by representatives of a newly discovered lineage of actinomycetes. Microbiology. 2006; 152: 675–683. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28335-0.
87. Elham B., Sevda H. Antagonistic activity of actinomyces isolated from Azerbaijan’s soils. J Eco Heal Env. 2016. 4 (3): 111–114. doi: 10.18576/jehe/040302.
88. Swiecimska M., Golinska P., Goodfellow M. Generation of a high quality library of bioactive filamentous actinomycetes from extreme biomes using a culture-based bioprospecting strategy. Front Microbiol. 2023; 13: 1054384. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1054384.
89. Basilio A., Gonzalez I., Vicente M. F., Gorrochategui J., Cabello A., Gonzalez A., et al. Patterns of antimicrobial activities from soil actinomycetes isolated under different conditions of pH and salinity. J Appl Microbiol. 2003; 95: 814–823. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02049.x.
90. Rousk J., Brookes P. C., Baath E. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75 (6): 1589–1596. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02775-08.
91. Kim Y. R., Park S., Kim T-.S., Kim M.-K., Han J.-H., Joung Y. et al. Draft genome sequence of Streptacidiphilus oryzae TH49T, an acidophilic actinobacterium isolated from soil. Genome Announc. 2015; 3 (3): e00703–15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00703-15.
92. Majer H. M., Ehrlich R. L., Ahmed A., Earl J. P., Ehrlich G. D., Beld J. Whole genome sequencing of Streptomyces actuosus ISP-5337, Streptomyces sioyaensis B-5408, and Actinospica acidiphila B-2296 reveals secondary metabolomes with antibiotic potential. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2021; 29 e00596. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00596.
93. Malik A., Kim Y. R., Jang I.H, Hwang S., Oh D.-C., Kim S. B. Genomebased analysis for the bioactive potential of Streptomyces yeochonensis CN732, an acidophilic filamentous soil actinobacterium. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21 (1): 118. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6468-5.
94. Buszewski B., Railean-Plugaru V., Pomastowski P., Rafinska K., SzultkaMlynska M., Golinska P. et al. Antimicrobial activity of biosilver nanoparticles produced by a novel Streptacidiphilus durhamensis strain. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018; 51 (1): 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2016.03.002.
95. Skladanowski M., Wypij M., Laskowski D., Golin´ska P. Dahm H., Rai M. Silver and gold nanoparticles synthesized from Streptomyces sp. isolated from acid forest soil with special reference to its antibacterial activity against pathogens. J Clust Sci. 2017; 28: 59–79. doi: 10.1007/s10876016-1043-6.
96. Railean-Plugaru V., Pomastowski P., Wypij M., Szultka-Mlynska M., Rafinska K., Golinska P. et al. Study of silver nanoparticles synthesized by acidophilic strain of Actinobacteria isolated from the of Picea sitchensis forest soil. J Appl Microbiol. 2016; 120 (5): 1250–1263. doi: 10.1111/jam.13093.
97. Golinska P., Wypij M., Rathod D., Tikar S., Dahm H., Rai M. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles from two acidophilic strains of Pilimelia columellifera subsp. pallida and their antibacterial activities. J Basic Microbiol. 2016; 56: 541–556. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201500516.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Чумак А.В., Синёва О.Н. Биоразнообразие и антимикробный потенциал ацидофильных и ацидотолерантных актиномицетов. Антибиотики и Химиотерапия. 2024;69(11-12):101-109. https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2024-69-11-12-101-109. EDN: BVSMZU
For citation:
Chumak A.V., Sineva O.N. Biodiversity and Antimicrobial Potential of Acidophilic and Acidotolerant Actinomycetes. Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2024;69(11-12):101-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2024-69-11-12-101-109. EDN: BVSMZU
Просмотров:
508
Послать статью по эл. почте 