Optimal Dosage Regimen of Grammidin® with Anesthetic in the Treatment of Acute Infectious Inflammatory Conditions of the Pharynx
https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2025-70-11-12-43-50
EDN: CYMMIQ
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of Grammidin® with anesthetic (metered-dose oropharyngeal spray) in the treatment of acute infectious inflammatory conditions of the pharynx. Materials and methods. The study included a total of 222 patients presenting with sore throat as the predominant symptom, diagnosed with acute pharyngitis, acute nasopharyngitis, or acute exacerbation of chronic pharyngitis. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to 3 parallel groups of equal size (N = 74 per group). Patients randomized to group 1 received Grammidin® with anesthetic (metered-dose oropharyngeal spray), 2 sprays every 6 hours (3 times daily) after meals; participants in group 2 received the same formulation, 4 sprays every 6 hours (3 times daily) after meals; and participants in group 3 received Septolete® Total (lozenges; benzydamine hydrochloride 3 mg and cetylpyridinium chloride 1 mg), 1 lozenge every 6 hours (3 times daily). The treatment duration was 7 days. Efficacy was assessed based on: reduction in sore throat intensity, measured using a visual analog scale (VAS); changes in symptom severity according to the Tonsillopharyngitis Clinical Scoring Scale; presence and severity of erythema and edema of the pharyngeal and tonsillar mucosa, as well as the severity of systemic intoxication symptoms. Results. Primary endpoint analysis (ITT population) confirmed a statistically significant dose-related effect of Grammidin® with anesthetic: the 4-spray regimen demonstrated greater reduction in VAS throat pain scores 60 minutes after the first administration in contrast with both comparators. Mean differences (rounded to 1 decimal place) were 9.29 mm in the Grammidin® with anesthetic 2-spray regimen group and 11.66 mm in the Septolete® Total group, respectively. By day 8, all patients demonstrated clinically significant improvement, with no statistically significant between-group differences (P = 0.197). Per-protocol analysis on day 8 confirmed sustained symptomatic benefit of Grammidin® with anesthetic over Septolete® Total across both dose levels on the Tonsillopharyngitis Clinical Scoring Scale (2 sprays vs comparator: P = 0.008; 4 sprays vs comparator: P = 0.024), supporting a consistent clinical benefit. Conclusion. The 4-spray, 3-times-daily (after meals) regimen of Grammidin® with anesthetic for 7 days demonstrated a clinically relevant benefit over both the 2-spray regimen (3-times-daily after meals) and the active comparator, Septolete® Total (1 lozenge every 6 hours 3 times daily), in the treatment of acute infectious-inflammatory pharyngeal conditions. The safety profile of Grammidin® with anesthetic was consistent across dose levels, with no clinically important differences observed relative to Septolete® Total.
About the Authors
O. V. KarneevaRussian Federation
Olga V. Karneeva — D. Sc. in Medicine, Associate Professor, Deputy Director for Scientific and Academic Work, National Medical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology of the Federal Medico-Biological Agency of Russia; Professor of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
A. V. Gurov
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Gurov — D. Sc. in Medicine, Professor of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology named after Acad. B.S. Preobrazhensky, Faculty of Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Senior Researcher, Department of Epidemiology, Methodology and Scientific Forecasting, Sverzhevsky Scientific Research Clinical Institute of Otorhinolaryngology.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
E. P. Karpova
Russian Federation
Elena P. Karpova — D. Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology named after Prof. B.V. Shevrigin, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
T. I. Garashchenko
Russian Federation
Tatiana I. Garashchenko — D. Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Scientific Secretary, National Medical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology of the Federal Medico-Biological Agency of Russia; Professor of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
D. A. Tulupov
Russian Federation
Denis A. Tulupov — Ph. D. in Medicine, Associate Professor of the Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology named after Prof. B. V. Shevrigin, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
V. B. Vasilyuk
Russian Federation
Vasiliy B. Vasilyuk — D. Sc. in Medicine, Managing Director, Scientific Research Center Eco-Safety LLC.
Saint-Petersburg
Competing Interests:
None
E. D. Volnaya
Russian Federation
Elena D. Volnaya — Chief Physician at the UNIMED-S, CJSC.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
D. N. Alpenidze
Russian Federation
Diana N. Alpenidze — Ph. D. in Medicine, Head of the Department of Endocrinology at the City Outpatient Clinic No. 117.
Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
None
M. A. Leonteva
Russian Federation
Marina A. Leonteva — Assistant Professor, Department of Faculty Therapy with Courses in Endocrinology and Cardiology, G. F. Lang Clinic, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University.
Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
None
I. V. Gamova
Russian Federation
Inna V. Gamova — Ph. D. in Medicine, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology named after Professor N. G. Astafyeva of the Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky.
Saratov
Competing Interests:
None
A. A. Globenko
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Globenko — Head of the Medical Department, Valenta Pharm JSC.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
A. V. Kapashin
Russian Federation
Aleksey V. Kapashin — Senior Manager of the Medical Department, Valenta Pharm JSC.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
M. A. Pasko
Russian Federation
Maksim A. Pasko — Ph. D. in Medicine, Manager of the Medical Department, Valenta Pharm JSC.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. Zotova A. V., Dolgikh T. A., Marunich N. A. Oropharyngeal syndrome in the clinic of infectious diseases. Current issues of otorhinolaryngology: Proceedings of the interregional scientific and practical conference of otorhinolaryngologists of Siberia and the Far East with international participation, Blagoveshchensk, July 04–05, 2023. Volume Issue 21. Blagoveshchensk: Amur State Medical Academy. 2023; 186-190. (in Russian)
2. Kirichenko I. M. Sore throat in children: diagnosis, treatment, prevention. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2022; 16 (12): 28–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-12-28-35. (in Russian)
3. Smith K. L., Hughes R., Myrex P. Tonsillitis and tonsilloliths: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2023; 107 (1): 35–41.
4. Krüger K., Töpfner N., Berner R., Windfuhr J., Oltrogge J. H. Clinical practice guideline: sore throat. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2021; 118 (11): 188–194. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0121.
5. Filippova O. V. Acute tonsillopharyngitis: possibilities of combined treatment. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2024; 8 (8): 477–483. doi: https://doi.org/10.32364/2587-6821-2024-8-8-6. (in Russian)
6. Radtsig E. Yu., Bogomilsky M. R., Kotova E. N., Pivneva N. D. Sore throat: symptom and treatment methods. RMJ. 2012; 16: 832–836. (in Russian)
7. Kryukov A. I., Gurov A. V., Guseva O. A., Izotova G. N., Kravchuk A. P. Etiotropic and pathogenetic therapy of pain syndrome in the oropharynx. Meditsinsky Sovet. 2015; 3: 51–55 (in Russian)
8. Svistushkin V. M., Nikiforova G. N., Mokoyan Zh.T. Place of topical antimicrobial drugs in pharmacotherapy of inflammatory diseases of the pharynx. RMJ. 2017; 25 (23): 1739–1743 (in Russian)
9. Morozova S. V., Pavlyshina E. M. Topical therapy of combined inflammatory diseases of the pharynx and oral cavity. Meditsinsky Sovet. 2019; 8: 18–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-8-18-27. (in Russian)
10. Gurov A. V., Dubovaya T. K., Ermolaev A. G., Murzakhanova Z. V., Makhmudova N. R., Dombalagyan A. Kh. Possibilities of modern forms of antimicrobial peptides in the treatment of inflammatory pathology of the pharynx. Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology = Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2022; 87 (5): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20228705143. (in Russian)
11. Shchubelko R. V., Zuikova I. N., Shuljenko A. E. Mucosal immunity of the upper respiratory tract. Immunologiya. 2018; 39 (1): 81–88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0206-4952-2018-39-1-81-88. (in Russian)
12. Gurov A. V., Yushkina M. A., Muzhichkova A. V. Microbiocenosis-regulating therapy of inflammatory pathology of the oropharynx. Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology = Vestnik Otorinolaringologii. 2021; 86 (6): 51–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20218606151. (in Russian)
13. Zakharova I. N., Berezhnaya I. V., Kuznetsova I. S., Cherednikova T. A., Makhaeva A. V., Odintsova V. E., Koshechkin S. I., Romanov V. A. The effect of local use of etiotropic drugs on the oropharyngeal microbiota in children with acute respiratory infection. Meditsinskiy Sovet = Medical Council. 2024; (1): 25–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-037
14. Ovchinnikov A. Yu., Miroshnichenko N. A., Nikolaeva Yu. O. New effects of a topical antimicrobial (agent) in the treatment of acute tonsillopharyngitis. Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology = Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2023; 88 (4): 93–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20238804193. (in Russian)
15. Acute tonsillitis and pharyngitis (Acute tonsillopharyngitis). Clinical recommendations. 2024. (in Russian)
16. Suzumoto M., Hotomi M., Billal D. S., Fujihara K., Harabuchi Ya., Yamanaka N. A scoring system for management of acute pharyngotonsillitis in adults. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009; 36 (3): 314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2008.07.001
17. Nikiforova G. N., Petrova E. I. Inflammatory diseases of the pharynx — possibilities of topical etiopatogenetic therapy. Farmateka. 2017; S2: Otorinolaringologija: 31–34. https://www.elibrary.ru/title_about_new.asp?id=9504. (in Russian)
18. Svistushkin V. M., Nikiforova G. N., Shevchik E. A., Toporkova L. A.Efficacy of topical drugs in the treatment of patients with acute inflammatory diseases of the pharynx. Vestnik Otorinolaringolii. 2019; 84 (6): 112–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201984061112. (in Russian)
19. Berditsch M., Afonin S., Reuster J., Lux H., Schkolin K., Babii O., et al. Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci. Sci Rep. 2019: 29; 9 (1): 17938. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54212-z
20. Gurov A. V., Borovkova K. E., Kryshen K. L., Nikiforova L. R., Salmova Yu. V. Evaluation of the bactericidal activity of gramicidin S against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with single and multiple (course) exposure. Antibiotiki i Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2022; 67: 7–8: 8–18. https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2022-67-7-8-8-18. (in Russian)
21. Quisno R., Foter M. J. Cetyl pyridinium chloride; germicidal properties. J Bacteriol. 1946: 52: 111-7. doi: 10.1128/JB.52.1.111-117.1946.
22. Melekhina E. V., Muzyka A. D., Ponezheva Zh. B., Gorelov A. V. Tsetilpiridiniya khlorid v sostave kombinirovannykh preparatov dlya vzroslykh i detej v period pandemii COVID-19: podtverzhdennye vozmozhnosti i perspektivy. RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie. 2021; 5 (11): 728–736. doi: https://doi.org/10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-11-728-736. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Karneeva OV, Gurov AV, Karpova EP, Garashchenko TI, Tulupov DA, Vasilyuk VB, Volnaya ED, Alpenidze DN, Leonteva MA, Gamova IV, Globenko AA, Kapashin AV, Pasko MA. Optimal Dosage Regimen of Grammidin® with Anesthetic in the Treatment of Acute Infectious Inflammatory Conditions of the Pharynx. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2025;70(11-12):43-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2025-70-11-12-43-50. EDN: CYMMIQ
JATS XML
















































