Preview

Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy

Advanced search

Effect of Differences in the CLSI and EUCAST Criteria on the Interpretation of Enterobacteriaceae Sensitivity to Carbapenems

https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2021-66-7-8-30-37

Abstract

Relevance: The two systems for determining the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial drugs, CLSI and EUCAST, are recommended for use in the global system of epidemiological surveillance of antimicrobial resistance of the World Health Organization. However, they differ in the methodology of setting an antimicrobial susceptibility testing, threshold values of cut-off points, as well as interpretation of results. The true significance of methodological differences between these systems for global microbiological monitoring is unclear.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of differences in the cut-off points of CLSI and EUCAST on the interpretation of antimicrobial sensitivity of microorganisms to carbapenems in Saint Petersburg.

Design: screening and comparative study.

Materials and methods. Sensitivity to Meropenem was studied in Escherichia coli (n=2956), as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=1189) for the period of 2011–2013 and 2016–2019, and interpreted according to the threshold values of the two guidelines (2020). Results. The weighted Kappa showed good agreement between the EUCAST vs CLSI standards for both E.coli (0.58; 95% CI 0.55–0.61) and K.pneumoniae (0.77; 0.73–0.81). Mcnemar's Chi-square test revealed differences between the two standards in assessing sensitivity to Meropenem of E.coli which were 5.31% (95% CI 5.06–5.31%, P<0.0001), and of K.pneumoniae — 3.95% (95% CI 3.36–3.95%, P<0.0001).

Conclusion. The reliability of determining sensitivity bacteria to anti-microbial drugs has a significant impact on their rational use and the results of microbiological monitoring. The first priority is to develop national standards that take regional characteristics into account.

About the Authors

L. A. Kornoukhova
Saint Petersburg State University Hospital; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Lyubov A. Kornoukhova — Ph. D. in medicine

Saint Petersburg, 199004



V. L. Emanuel
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Vladimir L. Emanuel — D. Sc. in medicine, Professor

Saint Petersburg



Yu. V. Gurieva
North-Western Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Co
Russian Federation

Yulia V. Gurieva — bacteriologist

Saint Petersburg



I. G. Chernykh
North-Western Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Co
Russian Federation

Irina G. Chernykh — bacteriologist

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Metodicheskie ukazaniya 4.2.1890-04 «Opredelenie chuvstvitel'nosti mikroorganizmov k antibakterial'nym preparatam», 2004. Dostupno po: https://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru/documents/details.php?ELEMENT_ID=4957&sphrase_id=2756796 Ssylka aktivna na 18.09.2020. (in Russian)

2. World Health Organization. Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system: manual for early implementation. WHO, Geneva; 2015.

3. CLSI. (CLSI supplement M100) in: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 30th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; 2020.

4. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters — version 10.0; 2020.

5. Hindler J.F., Stelling J. Analysis and presentation of cumulative antibiograms: a new consensus guideline from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44: 867–873. doi: 10.1086/511864.

6. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Routine and extended internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST. Version 8.0, 2018. http://www.eucast.org.

7. The EUCAST guideline on detection of resistance mechanisms v 2.0 (2017-07-11).

8. The EUCAST guideline on detection of resistance mechanisms v 2.0 (2017-07-11)

9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008). Developement of in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters: approved guideline, 3 rd edn. Wayne, PA: CLSI. CLSI Document M23. A3.

10. Jorgensen J. H., Ferraro M.J. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 49 (11): 1749–1755. doi: 10.1086/647952.

11. Strategiya razvitiya zdravoohraneniya v Rossijskoj Federacii do 2025 goda. Moscow: Ukaz prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii; 2019; 254: 1–19. Dostupno po: http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/c6zjQF82Y5ZKwoEiziMVNZY76MgZS9XI.pdf Ssylka aktivna na 18.09.2020. (in Russian)

12. Plan meropriyatij («dorozhnaya karta») po sovershenstvovaniyu zakonodatel'stva i ustraneniyu administrativnyh bar'erov v celyah obespecheniya realizacii plana meropriyatij («dorozhnoj karty») Nacional'noj tekhnologicheskoj iniciativy po napravleniyu «Helsnet». Moscow: Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii; 05.05.2018; 870-r. Dostupno po: http://government.ru/docs/all/116506/ Ssylka aktivna na 18.09.2020. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Kornoukhova L.A., Emanuel V.L., Gurieva Yu.V., Chernykh I.G. Effect of Differences in the CLSI and EUCAST Criteria on the Interpretation of Enterobacteriaceae Sensitivity to Carbapenems. Antibiot Khimioter = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2021;66(7-8):30-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2021-66-7-8-30-37

Views: 1960


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-2990 (Print)