Популяционное фармакокинетическое/фармакодинамическое моделирование и терапевтический лекарственный мониторинг ванкомицина у новорождённых и недоношенных новорождённых
https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2025-70-9-10-77-90
EDN: MWLQYW
Аннотация
Актуальность. Ванкомицин широко используется для лечения тяжёлых инфекций, вызванных грамположительными микроорганизмами, включая метициллино-резистентные штаммы Staphylococcus aureus. При проведении антибактериальной терапии важно не только добиться оптимальной эффективности, но и минимизировать риски развития потенциальных нежелательных реакций. Особенно это актуально для препаратов с узким терапевтическим диапазоном, к которым относится ванкомицин, а также для таких особых групп пациентов, как новорождённые и недоношенные новорождённые, для которых характерен высокий уровень межиндивидуальной фармакокинетической и фармакодинамической (ФК/ФД) вариабельности. Дозирование ванкомицина в этих группах пациентов рекомендуют проводить под контролем терапевтического лекарственного мониторинга (ТЛМ). Цель. Основной целью работы был описательный анализ особенностей популяционного ФК/ФД моделирования ванкомицина в популяции новорождённых и недоношенных новорождённых. Материал и методы. Поиск статей был инициирован в поисковой системе PubMed® (MEDLINE) за период с 1981 г. до августа 2024 г. Результаты. Описаны основные подходы к персонализации режимов дозирования ванкомицина, методы расчёта рекомендованного в настоящее время целевого ФК/ФД индекса по данным ТЛМ для оптимизации терапии в клинической практике, включая Байесовский подход на основе мониторирования показателя «площадь под фармакокинетической кривой» (AUC) с помощью специализированного программного обеспечения. Представлены результаты систематического литературного обзора популяционных ФК/ФД моделей ванкомицина, описаны структуры моделей и идентифицированные факторы, влияющие на ФК вариабельность в популяции недоношенных новорождённых. В большинстве исследований в популяции новорождённых фармакокинетика ванкомицина лучше всего описывалась однокамерной моделью. В отобранных исследованиях (n=31), включающих недоношенных новорождённых, значения клиренса и объёма распределения ванкомицина были оценены в широком диапазоне (0,01–0,22 л/ч/кг и 0,47–1,5 л/кг соответственно) с оценками выраженной межиндивидуальной вариабельности ФК параметров, достигающей в исследованиях 50%. В большинстве этих исследований масса тела, почечная функция и/или возраст были выявлены как значимые предикторы клиренса ванкомицина, а масса тела — важный предиктор объёма распределения ванкомицина. Выводы. В популяции новорождённых наблюдаемая значительная межиндивидуальная ФК/ФД вариабельность ванкомицина приводит к высокому риску недостаточного или избыточного его дозирования при использовании стандартизованных схем, что свидетельствует в пользу процедуры ТЛМ для оптимизации терапии. Идентификация факторов, вносящих вклад в ФК вариабельность ванкомицина, и использование рассчитанных популяционных ФК моделей может помочь в выборе начального режима дозирования ванкомицина. Тем не менее, доля остаточной необъяснённой вариабельности, обычно остающаяся в этих финальных регрессионных моделях, демонстрирует необходимость ТЛМ для персонализации режимов дозирования ванкомицина. Дозирование на основе мониторирования AUC, желательно с применением Байесовского подхода, можно рассматривать как наилучший вариант для достижения целевых концентраций ванкомицина, наиболее вероятно обеспечивающих успех проводимой терапии MRSA инфекций, и для профилактики развития микробной резистентности у новорождённых.
Об авторах
И. Б. БондареваРоссия
Бондарева Ирина Борисовна — д. б. н., профессор кафедры общей и клинической фармакологии, Медицинский институт, Медицинский факультет
Москва
С. К. Зырянов
Россия
Зырянов Сергей Кенсаринович — д. м. н., профессор, зав. кафедрой общей и клинической фармакологии, Медицинский институт, Медицинский факультет; заместитель главного врача
Москва
И. Л. Асецкая
Россия
Асецкая Ирина Львовна — к. м. н., доцент, кафедра общей и клинической фармакологии, Медицинский институт, Медицинский факультет
Москва
М. С. Ченкуров
Россия
Ченкуров Михаил Станиславович — к. б. н., ассистент кафедры общей и клинической фармакологии, Медицинский институт, Медицинский факультет
Москва
А. А. Горбачева
Россия
Горбачева Анастасия Андреевна — аспирант кафедры общей и клинической фармакологии, Медицинский институт, Медицинский факультет
Москва
Список литературы
1. Patel S., Preuss C. V., Bernice F. Vancomycin. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; October 29, 2024.
2. Wilkins A. L., Lai T., Zhu X. et al. Individualized vancomycin dosing in infants: prospective evaluation of an online dose calculator. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023; 61 (3): 106728. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106728.
3. Kim J., Walker S. A., Iaboni D. C., Walker S. E., Eligsen M., Dunn M. S. et al. Determination of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in neonates to develop practical initial dosing recommendations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58 (5): 2830–2840. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01718-13.
4. Rallis D., Giapros V., Serbis A., Kosmeri C., Baltogianni M. Fighting antimicrobial resistance in neonatal intensive care units: rational use of antibiotics in neonatal sepsis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12 (3): 508. Published 2023 Mar 3. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030508.
5. Jacqz-Aigrain E., Leroux S., Zhao W., van den Anker J. N., Sharland M. How to use vancomycin optimally in neonates: remaining questions. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 8 (5): 635–648. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2015.1060124.
6. Tobin C. M., Darville J. M., Thomson A. H., Sweeney G., Wilson J. F., MacGowan A. P., White L. O. Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring: is there a consensus view? The results of a UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) for Antibiotic Assays questionnaire. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002; 50 (5): 713–718. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf212.
7. Geraci J. E. Vancomycin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977; 52 (10): 631–634.
8. Iwamoto T., Kagawa Y., Kojima M. Clinical efficacy of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients receiving vancomycin. Biol Pharm Bull. 2003; 26 (6): 876–879. doi: 10.1248/bpb.26.876.
9. Gemmell C. G., Edwards D. I., Fraise A. P., Gould F. K., Ridgway G. L., Warren R. E. et al. Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006; 57 (4): 589–608. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl017.
10. Jeffres M. N., Isakow W., Doherty J. A., McKinnon P.S., Ritchie D. J., Micek S. T., Kollef M. H. Predictors of mortality for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus health-care-associated pneumonia: specific evaluation of vancomycin pharmacokinetic indices. Chest. 2006; 130 (4): 947–955. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.4.947.
11. Yeh Y. C., Yeh K. M., Lin T. Y., Chiu S.-K., Yang Y.-S., Wang Y.-C., Lin J.-C. Impact of vancomycin MIC creep on patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2012; 45 (3): 214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2011.11.006.
12. Rybak M., Lomaestro B., Rotschafer J. C., Moellering R., Craig W., Billeter M. et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the american society of health-system pharmacists, the infectious diseases society of america, and the society of infectious diseases pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009; 66 (1): 82–98. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080434.
13. Avent M. L., Vaska V. L., Rogers B. A., Cheng A. C., van Hal S. J., Holmes N. E. et al. Vancomycin therapeutics and monitoring: a contemporary approach. Intern Med J. 2013; 43 (2): 110–119. doi: 10.1111/imj.12036.
14. Matsumoto K., Takesue Y., Ohmagari N., Mochizuki T., Mikamo H., Seki M. et al. Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a consensus review of the japanese society of chemotherapy and the japanese society of therapeutic drug monitoring. J Infect Chemother. 2013; 19 (3): 365–380. doi: 10.1007/s10156-013-0599-4.
15. Ye Z. K., Chen Y. L., Chen K., Zhang X.-L., Du G.-H., He B. et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a guideline of the division of therapeutic drug monitoring, chinese pharmacological society. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016; 71 (11): 3020–3025. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw254.
16. Álvarez R., López Cortés L. E., Molina J., Cisneros J. M., Pachón J. Optimizing the clinical use of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60 (5): 2601–2609. Published 2016 Apr 22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03147-14.
17. Rybak M. J., Le J., Lodise T. P., Levine D. P., Bradley J., Liu C., Mueller B. A. et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a revised consensus guideline and review by the american society of health-system pharmacists, the infectious diseases society of america, the pediatric infectious diseases society, and the society of infectious diseases pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020; 77 (11): 835–864. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa036.
18. Rhodin M. M., Anderson B. J., Peters A. M., Coulthard M. G., Wilkins B., Cole M. et al. Human renal function maturation: a quantitative description using weight and postmenstrual age. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009; 24 (1): 67–76. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0997-5.
19. Hughes J. H., Tong D. M. H., Faldasz J. D., Frymoyer A., Keizer R. J. Evaluation of neonatal and paediatric vancomycin pharmacokinetic models and the impact of maturation and serum creatinine covariates in a large multicentre data set. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023; 62 (1): 67–76. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01185-4.
20. Pauwels S., Allegaert K. Therapeutic drug monitoring in neonates. Arch Dis Child. 2016; 101 (4): 377–381. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305309.
21. Monteiro J. F., Hahn S. R., Gonçalves J., Fresco P. Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring and population pharmacokinetic models in special patient subpopulations. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018; 6 (4): e00420. doi: 10.1002/prp2.420.
22. Allegaert K., Mian P., van den Anker J. N. Developmental pharmacokinetics in neonates: maturational changes and beyond. Curr Pharm Des. 2017; 23 (38): 5769–5778. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170926121124.
23. Ward R. M., Benjamin D., Barrett J. S. et al. Safety, dosing, and pharmaceutical quality for studies that evaluate medicinal products (including biological products) in neonates. Pediatr Res. 2017; 81 (5): 692–711. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.221.
24. Allegaert K., Simons S. H.P, Tibboel D., Krekels E. H., Knibbe C. A., van den Anker J. N. Non-maturational covariates for dynamic systems pharmacology models in neonates, infants, and children: filling the gaps beyond developmental pharmacology. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017; 109S: S27–S31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.05.023.
25. Krekels E. H. J., van Hasselt J. G. C., van Den Anker J. N. et al. Evidence-based drug treatment for special patient populations through model-based approaches. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017; 1092: S22–S26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.05.022.
26. Young T. E. Therapeutic drug monitoring — the appropriate use of drug level measurement in the care of the neonate. Clin Perinatol. 2012; 39 (1): 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.12.009.
27. Gupta B. D., Sharma P., Bagla J., Parakh M., Soni J. P. Renal failure in asphyxiated neonates. Indian Pediatr. 2005; 42 (9): 928–934.
28. Liu C., Bayer A., Cosgrove S. E., Daum R. S., Fridkin S. K., Gorwitz R. J. et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52 (3): 285–292. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir034.
29. Kullar R., Davis S. L., Levine D. P., Rybak M. J. Impact of vancomycin exposure on outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: support for consensus guidelines suggested targets. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52 (8): 975–981. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir124.
30. Brown J., Brown K., Forrest A. Vancomycin AUC24/MIC ratio in patients with complicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its association with attributable mortality during hospitalization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56 (2): 634–638. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05609-11.
31. Holmes N. E., Turnidge J. D., Munckhof W. J. et al. Vancomycin A. U.C/MIC ratio and 30-day mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57 (4): 1654–1663. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01485-12.
32. Gawronski K. M., Goff D. A., Brown J., Khadem T. M., Bauer K. A. A stewardship program's retrospective evaluation of vancomycin AUC24/MIC and time to microbiological clearance in patients with methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and osteomyelitis. Clin Ther. 2013; 35 (6): 772–779. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.05.008.
33. Jung Y., Song K. H., Cho J. et al. Area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio as a predictor of vancomycin treatment outcome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014; 43 (2): 179–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijan-timicag.2013.10.017.
34. Lodise T. P., Drusano G. L., Zasowski E. et al. Vancomycin exposure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: how much is enough?. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59 (5): 666–675. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu398.
35. Casapao A. M., Lodise T. P., Davis S. L., Claeys K. C., Lullar R., Levine D. P., Rybak M. J. et al. Association between vancomycin day 1 exposure profile and outcomes among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59 (6): 29782985. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03970-14.
36. Mogle B. T., Steele J. M., Seabury R. W., Dang U. J., Kufel W. D. Implementation of a two-point pharmacokinetic AUC-based vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring approach in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018; 52 (6): 805–810. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.08.024.
37. Neely M. N., Youn G., Jones B., Jelliffe R. W., Drusano G. L., Rodvold K. A., Lodise T. Are vancomycin trough concentrations adequate for optimal dosing?. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58 (1): 309–316. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01653-13.
38. Chavada R., Ghosh N., Sandaradura I., Maley M., Van Hal S. J. Establishment of an AUC0–24 threshold for nephrotoxicity is a step towards individualized vancomycin dosing for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 61 (5): e02535-16. Published 2017 Apr 24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02535-16.
39. Zasowski E. J., Murray K. P., Trinh T. D., Finch N. A., Pogue J. M., Mynatt R. P., Rybak M. J. Identification of vancomycin exposure-toxicity thresholds in hospitalized patients receiving intravenous vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 62 (1): e01684–17. Published 2017 Dec 21. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01684-17.
40. Tsutsuura M., Moriyama H., Kojima N., Mizukami Y., Tashiro S., Osa S. et al. The monitoring of vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analyses of area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing and trough-guided dosing. BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21 (1): 153. Published 2021 Feb 6. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05858-6.
41. Leroux S., Jacqz-Aigrain E., Biran V., Lopez E., Madeleneau D., Wallon C. et al. Clinical Utility and Safety of a Model-Based Patient-Tailored Dose of Vancomycin in Neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60 (4): 2039–2042. Published 2016 Mar 25. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02214-15.
42. Frymoyer A., Hersh A. L., El-Komy M. H., Gaskari S., Su F., Drover D. R., Meurs K. V. Association between vancomycin trough concentration and area under the concentration-time curve in neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58 (11): 6454–6461. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03620-14.
43. Zhao W., Lopez E., Biran V., Durrmeyer X., Fakhoury M., Jacqz-Aigrain E. Vancomycin continuous infusion in neonates: dosing optimisation and therapeutic drug monitoring. Arch Dis Child. 2013; 98 (6): 449–453. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302765.
44. Stockmann C., Hersh A. L., Roberts J. K., Bhngsatiern J., Korgenski E. K., Spigarelli M. G. et al. Predictive performance of a vancomycin population pharmacokinetic model in neonates. Infect Dis Ther. 2015; 4 (2): 187–198. doi: 10.1007/s40121-015-0067-9.
45. Cies J. J., Moore W. S. 2nd, Nichols K., Knoderer C. A., Carella D. M., Chopra A. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment of vancomycin in neonates on extracorporeal life support. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017; 18 (10): 977–985. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001250.
46. Lestner J. M., Hill L. F., Heath P. T., Sharland M. Vancomycin toxicity in neonates: a review of the evidence. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016; 29 (3): 237–247. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000263.
47. Bhargava V., Malloy M., Fonseca R. The association between vancomycin trough concentrations and acute kidney injury in the neonatal intensive care unit. BMC Pediatr. 2017; 17 (1): 50. Published 2017 Feb 11. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0777-0.
48. Constance J. E., Balch A. H., Stockmann C., Linakis M. W., Korgenski E. K., Roberts J. K. et al. A propensity-matched cohort study of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016; 101 (3): F236–F243. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308459.
49. Tseng S. H., Lim C. P., Chen Q., Tang C. C., Kong S. T., Ho P. C. Evaluating the relationship between vancomycin trough concentration and 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve in neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62 (4): e01647–17. Published 2018 Mar 27. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01647-17.
50. Chen Y., Wu D., Dong M., Zhu Y., Li X., Chen C., Li Z. Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin and AUC-guided dosing in Chinese neonates and young infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 74 (7): 921–930. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2454-0.
51. Jacqz-Aigrain E., Leroux S., Thomson A. H., Allegaert K., Capparelli E. V., Biran V. et al. Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of individual data to design the first randomized efficacy trial of vancomycin in neonates and young infants. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019; 74 (8): 2128–2138. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz158.
52. Padari H., Oselin K., Tasa T., Metsvaht T., Lõivukene K., Lutsar I. Coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis in neonates: do we need to adapt vancomycin dose or target?. BMC Pediatr. 2016; 16 (1): 206. Published 2016 Dec 8. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0753-0.
53. Dao K., Guidi M., André P., Giannoni E., Basterrechea S., Zhao W. et al. Optimisation of vancomycin exposure in neonates based on the best level of evidence. Pharmacol Res. 2020; 154: 104278. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104278.
54. Janssen E. J. H., Välitalo P. A. J., Allegaert K., de Cock R. F.W., Simons S. H.P., Sherwin C. M.T. et al. Towards rational dosing algorithms for vancomycin in neonates and infants based on population pharmacokinetic modeling. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 60 (2): 1013–1021. Published 2015 Dec 7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01968-15.
55. Ringenberg T., Robinson C., Meyers R., Degnan L., Shan P., Siu A., SturgillM. Achievement of therapeutic vancomycin trough serum concentrations with empiric dosing in neonatal intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015; 34 (7): 742–747. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000664.
56. Vandendriessche A., Allegaert K., Cossey V., Naulaers G., Saegeman V., Smits A. Prospective validation of neonatal vancomycin dosing regimens is urgently needed. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2014; 76: 51–57. Published 2014 Jul 14. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2014.06.001.
57. Chung E., Pelle B., Seto W. Improving precision of vancomycin dosing in neonates based on clinical outcomes and population pharmacokinetics. Journal of The American College of Clinical Pharmacy. 2022; 5 (12): 1458.
58. Tkachuk S., Collins K., Ensom M. H. H. The relationship between vancomycin trough concentrations and AUC/MIC ratios in pediatric patients: a qualitative systematic review. Paediatr Drugs. 2018; 20 (2): 153–164. doi: 10.1007/s40272-018-0282-4.
59. Sridharan K., Al Daylami A., Ajjawi R., Al-Ajooz H., Veeramuthu S. Clinical pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in critically ill children. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019; 44 (6): 807–816. doi: 10.1007/s13318-019-00568-6.
60. Issaranggoon Na Ayuthaya S., Katip W., Oberdorfer P., Lucksiri A. Correlation of the vancomycin 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and trough serum concentration in children with severe infection: A clinical pharmacokinetic study. Int J Infect Dis. 2020; 92: 151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.12.036.
61. Allegaert K., van de Velde M., van den Anker J. Neonatal clinical pharmacology. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014; 24 (1): 30–38. doi: 10.1111/pan.12176.
62. Alsultan A., Abouelkheir M., Alqahtani S., Aljabri A., Somily A. M., Alsubaie S., Alrabiaah A. et al. Optimizing vancomycin monitoring in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Jan; 39 (1): e13. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002536. Corrected and republished from: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018; 37 (9): 880–885. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001943.
63. Finch N. A., Zasowski E. J., Murray K. P. et al. A quasi-experiment to study the impact of vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing on vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 61 (12): e01293–17. Published 2017 Nov 22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01293-17.
64. Meng L., Wong T., Huang S. et al. Conversion from vancomycin trough concentration-guided dosing to area under the curve-guided dosing using two sample measurements in adults: implementation at an Academic Medical Center. Pharmacotherapy. 2019; 39 (4): 433–442. doi: 10.1002/phar.2234.
65. Wong-Beringer A., Joo J., Tse E., Beringer P. Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity: a critical appraisal of risk with high-dose therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011; 37 (2): 95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.013
66. Gonzalez D., Melloni C., Yogev R. et al. Use of opportunistic clinical data and a population pharmacokinetic model to support dosing of clindamycin for premature infants to adolescents. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 96 (4): 429–437. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.134.
67. Kimura T., Sunakawa K., Matsuura N., Kubo H., Shimada S., Yago K. Population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin, vancomycin, and panipenem in neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48 (4): 1159–1167. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1159-1167.2004.
68. Parasuraman J. M., Kloprogge F., Standing J. F., Albur M., Heep A. Population pharmacokinetics of intraventricular vancomycin in neonatal ventriculitis, a Preterm Pilot Study. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021; 158: 105643. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105643.
69. Parasuraman J. M., Albur M., Fellows G., Heep A. Monitoring intraventricular vancomycin for ventriculostomy access device infection in preterm infants. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018; 34 (3): 473–479. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3623-7.
70. Li X., Wu Y., Sun S., Mei S., Wang J., Wang Q., Zhao Z. Population Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Postoperative Neurosurgical Patients. J Pharm Sci. 2015; 104 (11): 3960–3967. doi: 10.1002/jps.24604.
71. Beach J. E., Perrott J., Turgeon R. D., Ensom M. H. H. Penetration of vancomycin into the cerebrospinal fluid: a systematic review. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017; 56 (12): 1479–1490. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0548-y.
72. Reiter P. D., Doron M. W. Vancomycin cerebrospinal fluid concentrations after intravenous administration in premature infants. J Perinatol. 1996; 16 (5): 331–335.
73. Matsunaga N., Hisata K., Shimizu T. An investigation into the vancomycin concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid due to vancomycin intraventricular administration in newborns: a study of 13 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94 (22): e922. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000922.
74. Mian P., Flint R. B., Tibboel D., van den Anker J. N., Allegaert K., Koch B. C.P. Therapeutic drug monitoring in neonates: what makes them unique? Curr Pharm Des. 2017; 23 (38): 5790–5800. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170926143820.
75. Allegaert K., Flint R., Smits A. Pharmacokinetic modelling and Bayesian estimation-assisted decision tools to optimize vancomycin dosage in neonates: only one piece of the puzzle. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2019; 15 (9): 735–749. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2019.1655540.
76. van Donge T., Bielicki J. A., van den Anker J., Pfister M. Key components for antibiotic dose optimization of sepsis in neonates and infants. Front Pediatr. 2018; 6: 325. Published 2018 Oct 29. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00325.
77. van den Anker J., Allegaert K. Rational use of antibiotics in neonates: still in search of tailored tools. Healthcare (Basel). 2019; 7 (1): 28. Published 2019 Feb 16. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010028.
78. Rivera-Chaparro N. D., Cohen-Wolkowiez M., Greenberg R. G. Dosing antibiotics in neonates: review of the pharmacokinetic data. Future Microbiol. 2017; 12 (11): 1001–1016. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2017-0058.
79. Zamoner W., Prado I. R. S., Balbi A. L., Ponce D. Vancomycin dosing, monitoring and toxicity: critical review of the clinical practice. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2019; 46 (4): 292–301. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13066.
80. Chung E., Sen J., Patel P., Seto W. Population pharmacokinetic models of vancomycin in paediatric patients: a systematic review. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021; 60 (8): 985–1001. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01027-9.
81. Marsot A., Boulamery A., Bruguerolle B., Simon N. Vancomycin: a review of population pharmacokinetic analyses. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012; 51 (1): 1–13. doi: 10.2165/11596390-000000000-00000.
82. Li D.-Y., Li L., Li G.-Z., Hu Y.-H., Guo H.-L., Jing X. et al. Population pharmacokinetics modeling of vancomycin among chinese infants with normal and augmented renal function. Front Pediatr. 2021; 9: 713588. Published 2021 Sep 20. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.713588.
83. Mulubwa M., Griesel H. A., Mugabo P., Dippenaar R., van Wyk L. Assessment of vancomycin pharmacokinetics and dose regimen optimisation in preterm neonates. Drugs R D. 2020; 20 (2): 105–113. doi: 10.1007/s40268-020-00302-7.
84. Smits A., Kulo A., van den Anker J., Allegaert K. The amikacin research program: a stepwise approach to validate dosing regimens in neonates. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017; 13 (2): 157–166. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1234606.
85. Zhao W., Kaguelidou F., Biran V., Zhang D., Allegaert K., Caparelli E. V. et al. External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models of vancomycin in neonates: the transferability of published models to different clinical settings. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 75 (4): 1068–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04406.x.
86. Hill L. F., Turner M. A., Lutsar I. et al. An optimised dosing regimen versus a standard dosing regimen of vancomycin for the treatment of late onset sepsis due to gram-positive microorganisms in neonates and infants aged less than 90days (NeoVanc): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2020; 21, 329. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4184-8.
87. Mehrotra N., Tang L., Phelps S. J., Meibohm B. Evaluation of vancomycin dosing regimens in preterm and term neonates using Monte Carlo simulations. Pharmacotherapy. 2012; 32 (5): 408–419. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01029.x.
88. Marqués-Miñana M. R., Saadeddin A., Peris J. E. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in neonates. A new proposal of initial dosage guideline. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 70 (5): 713–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03736.x.
89. Irikura M., Fujiyama A., Saita F., Fukushima S., Kiraoka H., Fukuda T. et al. Evaluation of the vancomycin dosage regimen based on serum creatinine used in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Int. 2011; 53 (6): 1038–1044. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2011.03441.x.
90. Capparelli E. V., Lane J. R., Romanowski G. L., McFeely E. J., Murray W., Sousa P. et al. The influences of renal function and maturation on vancomycin elimination in newborns and infants. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001; 41 (9): 927–934. doi: 10.1177/00912700122010898.
91. Kato H., Hagihara M., Nishiyama N. et al. Assessment of optimal initial dosing regimen with vancomycin pharmacokinetics model in very low birth weight neonates. J Infect Chemother. 2017; 23 (3): 154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.11.009.
92. James A., Koren G., Milliken J., Soldin S., Prober C. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics and dose recommendations for preterm infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31 (1): 52–54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.1.52.
93. Liem T. B. Y., Slob E. M. A., Termote J. U. M., Wolfs T. F. W., Egberts A. C. G., Rademaker C. M. A. Comparison of antibiotic dosing recommendations for neonatal sepsis from established reference sources. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018; 40 (2): 436–443. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0589-9.
94. Rajon K., Vaillancourt R., Varughese N., Villarreal G. Vancomycin use, dosing and serum trough concentrations in the pediatric population: a retrospective institutional review. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017; 15 (2): 887. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.887.
95. Frymoyer A., Stockmann C., Hersh A. L., Goswami S., Keizer R. J. Individualized empiric vancomycin dosing in neonates using a model-based approach. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019; 8 (2): 97–104. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pix109.
96. Le J., Bradley J. S., Murray W., Romanowski G. L., Tran T. T., Nguyen N. et al. Improved vancomycin dosing in children using area under the curve exposure. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013; 32 (4): e155–e163. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318286378e.
97. De Cock R. F., Allegaert K., Sherwin C. M., Nielsen E. I., De Hoog M., van den Anker J. N. et al. A neonatal amikacin covariate model can be used to predict ontogeny of other drugs eliminated through glomerular filtration in neonates. Pharm Res. 2014; 31 (3): 754–767. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1197-y.
98. De Cock R. F., Allegaert K., Brussee J. M., Sherwin C. M. T., Mulla H., De Hoog M. et al. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic modeling of gentamicin, tobramycin and vancomycin clearance from neonates to adults: towards a semi-physiological function for maturation in glomerular filtration. Pharm Res. 2014; 31 (10): 2643–2654. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1361-z.
99. Anderson B. J., Allegaert K., Van den Anker J. N., Cossey V., Holford N. H. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in preterm neonates and the prediction of adult clearance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 63 (1): 75–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02725.x.
100. De Hoog M., Schoemaker R. C., Mouton J. W., van den Anker J. N. Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics in neonates. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 67 (4): 360–367. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.105353.
101. Oudin C., Vialet R., Boulamery A., Martin C., Simon N. Vancomycin prescription in neonates and young infants: toward a simplified dosage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96 (5): F365—F370. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.196402.
102. Zhao W., Biran V., Jacqz-Aigrain E. Amikacin maturation model as a marker of renal maturation to predict glomerular filtration rate and vancomycin clearance in neonates. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013; 52 (12): 1127–1134. doi: 10.1007/s40262-013-0101-6.
103. Batchelor H. K., Marriott J. F. Paediatric pharmacokinetics: key considerations. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 79 (3): 395–404. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12267.
104. Kearns G. L., Abdel-Rahman S. M., Alander S. W., Blowey D. L., Leeder J. S., Kauffman R. E. Developmental pharmacology — drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349 (12): 1157–1167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035092
105. Holford N., Heo Y. A., Anderson B. A pharmacokinetic standard for babies and adults. J Pharm Sci. 2013; 102 (9): 2941–2952. doi: 10.1002/jps.23574.
106. Back H. M., Lee J. B., Han N., Goo S., Jung E., Kim J. et al. Application of size and maturation functions to population pharmacokinetic modeling of pediatric patients. Pharmaceutics. 2019; 11 (6): 259. Published 2019 Jun 3. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11060259.
107. Wang J., Kumar S. S., Sherwin C. M., Ward G., Baer G., Burckart G. J. et al. Renal clearance in newborns and infants: predictive performance of population-based modeling for drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 105 (6): 1462–1470. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1332.
108. Eiland L. S., English T. M., Eiland E. H. 3rd. Assessment of vancomycin dosing and subsequent serum concentrations in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2011; 45 (5): 582–589. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P588.
109. Broome L., So T. Y. An evaluation of initial vancomycin dosing in infants, children, and adolescents. Int J Pediatr. 2011; 2011: 470364. doi: 10.1155/2011/470364.
110. Frymoyer A., Guglielmo B. J., Wilson S. D., Scarpace S. B., Benet L. Z., Hersh A. L. Impact of a hospitalwide increase in empiric pediatric vancomycin dosing on initial trough concentrations. Pharmacotherapy. 2011; 31 (9): 871–876. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.9.871.
111. Bhongsatiern J., Stockmann C., Roberts J. K., Yu T., Korgenski K. E., Spigarelli M. G. et al. Evaluation of vancomycin use in late-onset neonatal sepsis using the area under the concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration400 target. Ther Drug Monit. 2015; 37 (6): 756–765. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000216.
112. Holford N. H., Buclin T. Safe and effective variability-a criterion for dose individualization. Ther Drug Monit. 2012; 34 (5): 565–568. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31826aabc3.
113. Xiao Q., Zhang H., Wu X., Qu J., Qin L., Wang C. Augmented Renal Clearance in Severe Infections-An Important Consideration in Vancomycin Dosing: A Narrative Review. Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13: 835557. Published 2022 Mar 21. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.835557.
114. Memiş H., Çakır A., Ülgey A. Therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin in the case of augmented renal clearance: a case report of a paediatric patient. Eur J Hosp Pharm. Published online January 10, 2024. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003982.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Бондарева ИБ, Зырянов С , Асецкая ИЛ, Ченкуров МС, Горбачева АА. Популяционное фармакокинетическое/фармакодинамическое моделирование и терапевтический лекарственный мониторинг ванкомицина у новорождённых и недоношенных новорождённых. Антибиотики и Химиотерапия. 2025;70(9-10):77-90. https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2025-70-9-10-77-90. EDN: MWLQYW
For citation:
Bondareva IB, Zyryanov SK, Asetskaya IL, Chenkurov MS, Gorbacheva AA. Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Terapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Neonates and Preterm Neonates. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya = Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2025;70(9-10):77-90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2025-70-9-10-77-90. EDN: MWLQYW
JATS XML
















































